Gabriel Ponce Hernández

Se ha escuchado en varias ocasiones que la costumbre debería ser una causa de exclusión de la antijuridicidad de una conducta típica, considerando que la ley debe comprender los sentimientos sociales y dotarlos de regulaciones para el buen convivir social.

Sin embargo, esta misma costumbre que debe ser regulada y reconocida por la ley, tiene que encontrarse ceñida a las buenas prácticas que conducen a la correcta administración pública, en beneficio de toda la colectividad, y donde las normas legales deben ser cuidadosamente cumplidas y respetadas, puesto que de no hacerlo se genera inseguridad jurídica, y un Estado ineficiente por la corrupción que degenera las estructuras democráticas, causando un perjuicio colectivo que atenta contra toda la confianza en el estado de derecho.

Palabras claves: Corrupción, administración pública, funcionario público, cultura, conducta ilícita, Constitución, cumplimiento de deber legal, democracia.

Abstract:

In several times, we have heard that cultural behavior must have to break the illegal understanding of some crimi- nal conducts, to become it permitted, us people practice it as a normal behavior, that have to be recognized by law to avoid any sanction.

The inconvenient come when this kind o cultural practice, involves public servants and with them the normal function of the public administration. It became a problem to Estate organization and to society, when public servants receives from individual any benefit that its not allow on his public job, but either of them offers and receives the bonus for the job done or to be done, because they understand that the public servant is doing a favor instead of accomplished his work.

In any democracy, this behavior is known us corruption, and the result of this illegal practices, is inse- curity of citizens before the public administration and its servants, so people doesn’t trust the government and whom they conform the administration.

Key words: Principles of the process, disponibility of the object of the process, dispositive principle, procedural powers, evidentiary activity.

Impactos: 750

Categories: Análisis

Deja una respuesta

Tu dirección de correo electrónico no será publicada.